There are many things that Jane McGonigal talks about in Reality is Broken that really resonate
with me. I heartily enjoy how she draws
from such an eclectic mix of disciplines to frame her argument.
She talks about one thing in particular
that I continually struggle with in her presentations of intrinsic and
extrinsic rewards. First of all, this
section delves chest-deep into the philosophical end of game design. McGonigal addresses the misleading nature of
the American Dream; that we gain happiness through the status and material
belongings we earn for ourselves through our hard work. She says that these are
temporary, extrinsic and hedonistic avenues of happiness. Over time we build up resistance to this form
of happiness and need to get greater and greater amounts of it to bring us
happiness. Unsurprisingly, she relates
this to drug usage. This model is
unsustainable.
The idea of intrinsic happiness is
happiness that comes from within. It
follows the mindset that the individual is the only force that can bring
happiness to itself. The overall system
is self-propagating, self-propelling and completely renewable. It follows the same sort of mindset that
Eleanor Roosevelt hearkens in saying “No one can make you feel inferior without
your consent.” The individual is the only force that can allow an external
event to affect her internal state. Yes, an outside force can affect an
individual’s physical body but only the individual can allow an event to affect
their spiritual body.
As one who is in the milieu of
American society, it is difficult for me to combat the cultural force of the
idealized American Dream. I completely
agree with McGonigal that the extrinsic aspects of the American Dream are
unhealthy. There is a great deal of unhappiness
in the world because there is an emphasis on the material and external
pleasures of life. The cultivation of
the individual’s innate happiness, separate from the larger cultural context,
is ignored; self-cultivation and inner peace are not the focus of the American
Dream.
I live in constant fear that I have
been living my life incorrectly; that I have concentrated on the wrong
things. As a person, I’m ambitious and
constantly working towards my future and I often feel that I neglect the present. Now, sure, that could be a temporary thing
because of the circumstances surrounding college. I do feel that I am working towards what
McGonigal outlines as the four major categories of intrinsic rewards, but I
often feel that there is a disparity between what my mind says I should do and
actually happens. There’s a phrase I try
to live by now in hopes that I will adjust myself and not lose sight of what I
feel should be most important, friends and family. That phrase is, “I choose to invest my time
and money in people and experiences.”
In the past, I’ve been victim of
gamer regret countless times.
Throughout, the years, though, the skills and mentality that I’ve
acquired are invaluable to me. The lens
of games has given me a new way to look at life.
There’s a movement to gamify
reality, and Jane McGonigal is a part of that.
I believe that through my upbringing I’ve become a part of it as well. Because of my exposure to games, I am able to
view the different systems that govern people in reality as the rules, the
procedure, the games that they truly are.
Through acknowledging that the procedures that govern life operate in
the much the same way as the procedures that control games, we are able to
sculpt a society that is happier. This
is exactly what Jane McGonigal is trying to get at.
Unfortunately, a good chunk of this
post is a bit of an incoherent rant.
Jane McGonigal hits on so many points in this reading that you could
literally write dissertations about the repercussions of what she’s saying. Since I’ve decided to go for a more free-form
blog entry, editing would bring greater cohesion to what I’m saying but there
always more to be done.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.